SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23209

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
A.Karuppiah – Appellant
Versus
1. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.C. Ramalingam
For the Respondents: Mr. S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader

Table of Content
1. seeking direction for land removal encroachment. (Para 1)
2. court finds land classification outside encroachment law applicability. (Para 2)

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

The petitioner seeks a direction to remove the fourth respondent, who is said to have encroached upon the grama natham land.

2. The details of the affidavit itself indicate that the fourth respondent has encroached upon the grama natham land in survey No. 204/34. Once the land is classified as grama natham, this Court is of the view that the same will not come under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 to take action. Further, the entire prediction is bereft of details as the fourth respondent has encroached upon the grama natham land. In such view of the matter, we cannot give a positive direction in this regard. Hence, we find no merits in the writ petition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top