SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23266

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J
Annai Food Products Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent Ambattur Outer Range, Ponneri Division, Office of the Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Chennai Outer Commissionerate – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 48/2025-GST



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s. P. Bharath Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.K.S.Ramasamy Senior Standing Counsel for R1 to R3

A writ petition under Article 226 can be contingent upon preconditions such as deposit of disputed tax to enable an appeal.

Headnote:This Writ Petition challenges the impugned order dated 05.02.2025 passed by the first respondent under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner agreed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a pre-condition for the appeal. The court granted liberty for the appeal subject to these conditions and noted that a similar approach was taken in past cases. It concluded that failure to comply would allow proceedings against the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. conditions for appeal based on tax deposit. (Para 3 , 4)
2. court observations on appeal processes and compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)

ORDER

Heard Mr.P.Bharath Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Ramasamy, the learned Senior Standing counsel for R1 to R3.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent.

3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 05.02.2025 vide Original No.48/2025, passed by the first respondent.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit 25% of the disputed tax confirmed vide Impugned Order dated 05.02.2025 as a condition for entertaining the appeal against the impugned order passed by the Appellate Authority.

5. The learned Government Advocate has no objection for the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following endorsement in the Court bundle which is extracted hereunder:

“25% of the disputed admitted within 30 days from the date of order.”

6. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the 1st Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the Appellate Authority subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax confirmed vide Impugned Order dated 05.02.2025, in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Appellate Authority shall dispose the appeal on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of filing of appeal. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner, shall also stand automatically vacated.

9. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

10. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the

1st Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the 1st Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

13. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top