Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
D.Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Kancheepuram District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for loan consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's commitment to resolve request. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's directive for timely response. (Para 4) |
| 4. conclusion and outcome of the petition. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2020.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation dated 17.02.2020 requesting the respondents to grant loan in favour of the petitioner as per the official letter dated 12.11.2018 issued by the 6th respondent to the 5th respondent. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date.
Hence, this petition.
3. In reply, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of by the 5th respondent within a period of 4 weeks.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
