Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
M.S.Radhamony Amma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner working as a middle school headmaster. (Para 1) |
| 2. rules on qualification and incentive increment for promotion. (Para 2) |
| 3. government's reliance on incorrect legal precedent. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. court's role in reviewing submissions and evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner, who is working as a Middle School Headmaster, has filed this writ petition as against the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the 4th respondent cancelling the incentive increment provided to this petitioner for obtaining the additional qualification of B.Ed., degree and also ordering for recovery of the excess incentive increment.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been provided with incentive increment for obtaining B.Ed. qualification from 2012 onwards and the government has sought to recover the same based on a government Letter No. 3702/Tho.Kal(2)/2017 dated 10.10.2017. He submits that the government letter, referred in the impugned order was already quashed by this court in M.Puspa Theresa vs State of Tamil Nadu in [WP.No.22907 of 2021, dated 27.10.2021] and the same was also upheld by a Division Bench of this court in State of Tamil Nadu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
