Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
Mir Ziauddin – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Chennai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ of mandamus petition context (Para 1) |
| 2. contentions regarding road encroachment (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court's directive on encroachment enforcement (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
(R6 to R9 are substituted as Lrs of the deceased fifth respondent R5 vide order dted
23.01.2026 made in WMP.1993/2026 in WP.13467/2021 by SMSJ, CKJ)
..Respondent(s)
Directing the 3rd and 4th respondents herein, to restore the original Road, by removing the deviation , and also to remove the illegal encroachment put up by the 5th Respondent, in front of the petitioner land situated in survey No.287, Injambakkam Village, Saidapet Division, now Sholinganallur Taluk.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Divakaran For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun kumar, AGP for R1 to R4 , R5 - Died , Mr.Sandeep Shah for Mr.Bhaghyamchari for R6
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
The Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to restore the original road by removing the deviation and also to remove the illegal encroachment put up by the 5th Respondent, in front of the petitioner’s land situated in Survey No.287, Injambakkam Village, Saidapet Division, now Sholinganallur Taluk.
2. Learned counsel for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
