SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
Mir Ziauddin – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Chennai District – Respondent
WP No. 13467 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.B.Divakaran
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Arun kumar, AGP for R1 to R4 , R5 - Died , Mr.Sandeep Shah for Mr.Bhaghyamchari for R6

Authorities are obligated to remove identified encroachments on public roads, and the affected parties must be provided an opportunity to defend their case following relevant statutes.

Headnote:(A) Writ of Mandamus - Directing respondents to restore original road and remove encroachments - Petitioner claims illegal encroachments by contesting respondents on public road, despite complaints. Authorities conducted inspection and identified encroachments, necessitating enforcement action per relevant statutes. (Paras 1-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner instituted a writ seeking restoration of the original road and removal of illegal encroachments affecting their land in Injambakkam Village.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the authorities must act upon identified encroachments with proper procedures, allowing for defense from the contesting respondents, directing completion of actions within twelve weeks.

Issues: The principal issue is whether there is illegal encroachment by the contesting respondents on public land.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that authorities must enforce the law against encroachments after conducting necessary inspections and surveys.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. writ of mandamus petition context (Para 1)
2. contentions regarding road encroachment (Para 2 , 4)
3. court's directive on encroachment enforcement (Para 3 , 5 , 6)

(R6 to R9 are substituted as Lrs of the deceased fifth respondent R5 vide order dted

23.01.2026 made in WMP.1993/2026 in WP.13467/2021 by SMSJ, CKJ)

..Respondent(s)

Directing the 3rd and 4th respondents herein, to restore the original Road, by removing the deviation , and also to remove the illegal encroachment put up by the 5th Respondent, in front of the petitioner land situated in survey No.287, Injambakkam Village, Saidapet Division, now Sholinganallur Taluk.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Divakaran For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun kumar, AGP for R1 to R4 , R5 - Died , Mr.Sandeep Shah for Mr.Bhaghyamchari for R6

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

The Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to restore the original road by removing the deviation and also to remove the illegal encroachment put up by the 5th Respondent, in front of the petitioner’s land situated in Survey No.287, Injambakkam Village, Saidapet Division, now Sholinganallur Taluk.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the contesting respondents have encroached upon the public road. Complaints sent to the respondents, since not addressed, the present writ petition came to be instituted.

3. The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur, filed a counter affidavit stating that the inspection and survey was conducted and encroachments in road are also identified.

4. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents would submit that the respondents 6 to 9 have not encroached upon the public land.

5. Be that as it may. The authorities, since conducted inspection and survey and identified the encroachments in public road, they are bound to initiate enforcement action by following the proceedings as contemplated under the relevant statues and rules in force. Opportunities are to be afforded to the encroachers and thereafter, the encroachers are to be evicted from the public road or government lands.

6. Learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the properties are falling under the jurisdiction of Chennai Corporation. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a copy of this order to the Commissioner, Chennai Corporation for initiation of appropriate action in co-ordination with the Tahsildar, Sholinganallur, for removing of encroachments. The contesting respondents are at liberty to defend their case by submitting an explanation or documents, if any. Such exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of . No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top