SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23446

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
R.Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
K.Nandhakumar, I.A.S., Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, M.Anthonysamy John Peter Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (Housing) – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.26749 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

Court affirmed compliance with prior order, allowing petitioner to seek further remedies if aggrieved.

Headnote:The contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, concerning the non-compliance of the court order dated 25.09.2025, which directed consideration of the petitioner's representation within eight weeks. The respondents submitted a document, indicating compliance with the court's order. The court concluded that the respondents had complied, closing the contempt petition. The petitioner retains the right to seek remedy if dissatisfied with the proceedings dated 01.12.2025.

Table of Content
1. petition filed for willful disobedience of a court order. (Para 1)
2. court observed compliance with prior order. (Para 2)
3. petitioner may seek further remedies if aggrieved. (Para 3)

O R D E R

This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner complaining willful disobedience of the order dated 25.09.2025, passed in W.P.(MD) No.26749 of 2025, whereby this Court directed the third respondent in the writ petition to consider the representation dated 06.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Mr.S.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents, placed before this Court a copy of the proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.6854/2015/A1, dated 01.12.2025, purported to be an order passed pursuant to the directions issued by this Court duly considering the representation dated 06.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner.

3. In the said circumstances, this Court is convinced that the respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and this contempt petition is, accordingly, closed. In case if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said proceedings dated 01.12.2025, it is open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top