Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
M.Kamardeen – Appellant
Versus
A.Ali Akbar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and petition overview (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellants dispute removal procedure (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments on improper enquiry conducted (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. counterarguments from the waqf board (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. findings and judicial review limitations (Para 14 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. court's analysis of conduct and inquiries (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. section 64 of waqf act considerations (Para 18) |
| 8. final ruling and dismissal of petitions (Para 23) |
COMMON ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition has been filed, challenging the order of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal dated 22.10.2025, confirming the order of the Waqf Board dated 15.10.2024.
2.The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set aside the order of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal dated 22.10.2025.
3.By order of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was directed to be heard along with the Civil Revision Petition and hence, both the matters have been taken up together.
4.I have heard Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahmed, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.N.A.Nassir Hussain, learned counsel for the appellants in CMA.No.3629 of 2025 and respondents 1 to 7 and 12 in CRP.No.6301 of 2025, Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan for M/s.G.R.Associates
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
