SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23479

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
K.Mutharasi – Appellant
Versus
the district collector – Respondent
WP No. 5600 of 2022 | WMP Nos. 5688 to 5690 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Sellapandian
For the Respondents: Mr.M.S.Prem Kumar, R.Dinesh Kumar

A petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the issue at hand has lost relevance.

Headnote:The relevant statute is not specified in the judgment. The petitioner sought to quash an order issued by the third respondent concerning measurement and encroachment issues. However, the court found the petition infructuous due to counsel's endorsement. Issues included whether the matter was still relevant, leading to the court's ruling. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Table of Content
1. court found issue infructuous. (Para 1)
2. court's dismissal order. (Para 2)

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

2. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top