Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ
Sri Thatha Kasi Sadasiva Arumuga Swamigal Temple Rep. by its Managing Trustee D.Satheeswaran – Appellant
Versus
the Assistant Engineer Zone-6, Division-73 Unit-17 Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent
WP No. 9781 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. withdrawal of writ petition granted. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
2. Recording the submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
