SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23553

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Thiyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India – Respondent
Writ Petition | Article 226



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No Appearance
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Arunachalam

A writ petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear in court after multiple listings.

Headnote:This judgment considers a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction for the return of original documents held by the 3rd respondent. The court noted that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on multiple occasions, indicating a lack of intent to prosecute the case. The court determined the petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution. The final order reflects a dismissal without costs.

ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing on 10.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter on 12.03.2026, under the caption “For Dismissal”. Accordingly the matter is listed today. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which shows that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the case. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top