SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23572

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
A.Bhuvendran – Appellant
Versus
1.The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005 – Respondent
WP.(MD)No.2231 of 2026 | W.M.P.(MD)No.1746 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Senior Counsel, for M/S.Roy and Roy Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Kannan, Additional Government Pleader, Mr.T.Sivananthan

The licensing authority must consider public interest and objections before granting licenses under the Tamil Nadu Liquor Rules.

Headnote:The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to prevent the granting of an FL2 license to the fourth respondent without considering the petitioner's objections. The court emphasized the need for the licensing authority to ensure that public interest is protected as per Rule 19(A) of the Tamil Nadu Liquor (Licence and Permit) Rules, 1981. The court directed that the objections be considered in accordance with the guidelines from a prior judgment (WP.(MD)No.21149 of 2025) before any decision is made. The writ petition was disposed of with no order on costs.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to prevent license granting. (Para 1 , 2)
2. objections to be considered. (Para 3)
3. court directs adherence to earlier guidelines. (Para 4)
4. writ petition disposed with no costs. (Para 5)

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

This writ petition has been filed to forbear the official respondent from granting FL2 license to the fourth respondent club without considering the objections submitted by the petitioner and other residents.

2.The main grievance of the writ petitioner is that he has given objections to grant FL2 license to the fourth respondent club. As per Rule 19(A) of the Tamil Nadu Liquor (Licence and Permit) Rules, 1981, before granting license, the licensing authority should satisfy himself that the local needs justify the grant of the licence and that the public interest shall not suffer. In this regard the petitioner has also given objections, which has not been considered by the official respondents.

Hence, the writ petition.

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, would submit that the objections of the petitioner will be considered before issuing any license.

4.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed on record.

5.Considering the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader on behalf of the official respondents, we direct the official respondents to consider the objections of the petitioner and to strictly follow the guidelines issued by this Court in WP.(MD)No.21149 of 2025 dated 22.08.2025, before taking any decision with regard to the issuance of FL2 license. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top