Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
N.S.Varalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
P.A.Punithavathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction action initiated by landlord under tnrrrlt act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner argues for maintainability based on tenancy agreement. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court underscores failure to establish tenancy agreement and maintains eviction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court dismisses revision but allows tenant time to vacate. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petitioner is the tenant. The respondent is the landlord.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as landlord and tenant.
3. The landlord filed R.L.T.O.P.No.1 of 2020 invoking Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act of 2017 , (hereinafter referred to as TNRRRLT Act) before the District Munsif cum Rent Court, Madurai Taluk. She invoked Section 21(2)(a) of the Act.
4. It is the case of the landlord that the tenant has to pay a monthly rent of Rs.4,000/-. The tenancy was for residential purposes. She alleged that the tenant had paid rents till November 2019 and defaulted in payment of rents thereafter. She sent a notice to the tenant on 16.12.2019. The tenant received the notice but did not respond to the same. The tenant,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
