Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J
S.Arunkumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep by The Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. insufficient evidence against accused (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. confession inadmissible following death of co-accused (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. proceedings quashed (Para 7) |
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl OP No.5889 of 2026 and Crl MP Nos.4353 & 4354 of 2026 S.Arunkumar ... Petitioner vs
1. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, R-4, Soundarapandiyanar Angadi Police Station, Pondy Bazaar, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017.
2.Viswanath .... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS , 2023, to call for the records in CC No.1052 of 2020 pending on the file of the XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, and quash the same insofar as the petitioner is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Veeraraghavan for Ms.G.Uma Maheswari For R1 : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This criminal original petition is filed to call for the records in CC No.1052 of 2020 pending on the file of the XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, and quash the same.
2.The petitioner, who is A2 in C.C.No.1052 of 2020, facing trial for an offence under Sections 34 and 394 IPC, has filed this quash application. The case of the pros
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
