SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Prabavathi – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk Chennai-600 005 – Respondent
Writ Petition - 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V.C.Janarthanam for Mr.S.Thiruvengadam
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl.GP (R1 to R5), Mr.R.Gopinath for R6, Mr.Mohamed Sajid for R7

Court enjoins status-quo on property rights pending resolution of civil suits to prevent injustice.

Headnote:This writ petition challenges orders dated 19.11.2025 and 18.06.2025, amidst claims of wrongful issuance of patta amidst pending civil suits. The court ruled to maintain status-quo till civil suits are resolved. The risk of actions against the patta during this period is restricted. Resulting in the writ petition's disposal with clear directives.

Table of Content
1. challenge to orders regarding property rights amidst civil suits (Para 1 , 2)
2. argument regarding the interim injunction's expiry (Para 3)
3. court's directive to maintain status-quo (Para 4)
4. final disposal of the writ petition with directives (Para 6)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated

19.11.2025 and 18.06.2025 passed by the respondents 3 and 4 respectively rejecting the petitioner’s request for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the private respondents.

2. According to the petitioner, erroneously and illegally, patta was issued in favour of the private respondents, despite the pendency of the civil suits. In such circumstances, the petitioner had sought for cancellation of patta. The respondents 3 and 4 have rejected the petitioner’s request. The petitioner was having the benefit of an interim injunction granted by the Civil Court to protect her interest.

3. However, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the seventh respondent that the said interim injunction was in force only upto 16.07.2025.

4. In the interest of justice, since the civil suits are pending and since the petitioner was having the benefit of interim injunction from the Civil Court pertaining to the very same property upto 16.07.2025, this Court deems it fit to direct the petitioner as well as the private respondents to maintain the status-quo till the disposal of the civil suits in O.S.No.831 of 2025 pending on the file of Additional District Judge (Special Court for SC/ST cases), Tiruppur; and O.S.No.97 of 2025 pending on the file of District Munsif Court, Tiruppur. 5. The learned counsels appearing for the private respondents have also not raised any serious objection for granting the aforesaid direction. It is also represented by the learned counsel for the sixth respondent that the sixth respondent is dead. The petitioner will have to take steps to bring on record the legal heirs of the sixth respondent before the Civil Court.

6. For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner and the respondents are directed to maintain the status-quo till the disposal of the aforesaid civil suits, and it is made clear that no further mutation of the revenue records can be done by the official respondents till the disposal of the aforesaid suits. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top