Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
Rajkumar M – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the suspension order under the guidelines of g.o.ms.no.81. (Para 2) |
| 2. debate on the applicability of g.o.ms.no.81 based on the criminal case. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court acknowledges the obligation to review the suspension. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court’s directive for a timely review of the suspension order. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the proceedings in RDOSNKL/3413/2025 dated 11.10.2025, whereby the petitioner was placed under suspension consequent to his involvement in a criminal case under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. More than five months have elapsed since the date of suspension.
Hence, the petitioner has challenged the said order of suspension dated 11.10.2025, contending that the continuance of suspension of the petitioner is contrary to the orders issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.81, Human Resources Management (N) Development Department, dated 04.08.2022.
3. Mr.V.Navaneetha Krishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the second respondent is under an obligation to review the suspension and to consider whether it is necessary to continue the petitioner under suspension.
4. M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
