SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23874

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
M.Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd. – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr.S.Arunachalam
For the Respondent: Mr.K.Ramaiah

The Transport Corporation lacked jurisdiction to recover amounts linked to unimplemented punishments as per prior judgments.

Headnote:The Court examined the legality of an amount recovered from the petitioner towards unimplemented punishment. It determined that the Transport Corporation had no jurisdiction to recover such amount in light of a prior judgement, directing a refund. The petitioner sought a mandamus for recovery of funds with interest. The final outcome is that the recovery was deemed illegal, and the petitioner is to be refunded the complete sum.

Table of Content
1. no jurisdiction to recover amounts for unimplemented punishment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. recovery is illegal; directive for refund issued. (Para 3)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to refund the amount of Rs.1,26,000/- recovered from the petitioner in the name of unimplemented punishment, together with

12% interest per annum.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.S.Arunachalam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Ramaiah, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the respondent – Corporation, agreed that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the Judgment passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court vide W.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2020, dated 15.06.2021, wherein it was held that the respondent – Transport Corporation is not entitled to recover any amount towards unimplemented orders of punishment of postponement of increment and any such attempt on the part of the respondent – Transport Corporation was held to be without jurisdiction.

3. In the light of the above, recovery of Rs.1,26,000/- from the petitioner towards unimplemented punishment of stoppage of increment is found to be declared as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law. Consequently, the respondent – Transport Corporation is directed to refund the amount of Rs.1,26,000/- to the petitioner together with 6% per annum, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above direction, this writ petition is allowed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top