Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23885
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
Mrs.Hilwiah Roche – Appellant
Versus
M/S PEREIRA and ROCHE Private Limited – Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal | C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Venkataraman
For the Respondents: No appearance
The dismissal of the appeal was based on the fact that the respondent company was struck off from the register, making adjudication unnecessary.
Headnote:This appeal was presented to challenge the decision made by the Company Law Board under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956, concerning C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001, emphasizing the fact that the first respondent company had been removed from the register. This rendered any further examination of the legal dispute unnecessary. The court concluded the appeal, stating that there was no purpose in adjudicating it further, and therefore, the appeal was dismissed without costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against company law board order. (Para 1) |
| 2. company's status affects the dispute. (Para 2) |
| 3. appeal dismissed as resolution unnecessary. (Para 3) |
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956, praying to set aside the order of the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai in C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001 and allow the above Appeal.
For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Venkataraman For Respondent(s): No appearance
JUDGMENT
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set aside the order of the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai in C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant had placed on record a screenshot from the website of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, which indicates the first respondent company had been struck off from the Register.
3. In view of the same, there is no useful purpose in adjudicating the lis involved in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands closed. No costs.
