SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
Mrs.Hilwiah Roche – Appellant
Versus
M/S PEREIRA and ROCHE Private Limited – Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal | C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Venkataraman
For the Respondents: No appearance

The dismissal of the appeal was based on the fact that the respondent company was struck off from the register, making adjudication unnecessary.

Headnote:This appeal was presented to challenge the decision made by the Company Law Board under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956, concerning C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001, emphasizing the fact that the first respondent company had been removed from the register. This rendered any further examination of the legal dispute unnecessary. The court concluded the appeal, stating that there was no purpose in adjudicating it further, and therefore, the appeal was dismissed without costs.

Table of Content
1. appeal against company law board order. (Para 1)
2. company's status affects the dispute. (Para 2)
3. appeal dismissed as resolution unnecessary. (Para 3)

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956, praying to set aside the order of the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai in C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001 and allow the above Appeal.

For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Venkataraman For Respondent(s): No appearance

JUDGMENT

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set aside the order of the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai in C.P.No.1/111/SRB/2001.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant had placed on record a screenshot from the website of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, which indicates the first respondent company had been struck off from the Register.

3. In view of the same, there is no useful purpose in adjudicating the lis involved in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top