Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Kumaresh Babu, J
V.Sundaramurhti – Appellant
Versus
Dharmalingam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order rejecting the appointment of advocate commissioner. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. trial court's reliance on existing documents to rule on property ownership. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. final verdict dismissing the revision petition. (Para 10) |
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 05.03.2021 made in I.A.No.03 of 2020 in A.S.No.07 of 2016 on the file of the Learned Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Villupuram.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Manoharan For Respondent(s): For R1 & R3 - No appearance For R4 – Died For R2 – Died R5 to R7 – Not ready in notice
ORDER
The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 05.03.2021 made in I.A.No.03 of 2020 in A.S.No.07 of 2016 on the file of the Learned Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Villupuram.
2. Heard Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. In spite of notice having been served on respondents 1 and 3 and their names also having been printed in the cause list today, there is no representation on the side of the respondents 1 and 3.
4. The challeng
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
