Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
Chetric Charles – Appellant
Versus
The District Educational Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's consideration in absence of petitioner. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal for non-prosecution. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
This matter came up for consideration before this Court on
05.03.2026. As there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” today.
2. In spite of the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this Writ Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
