SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
M.Nagur Meeran – Appellant
Versus
Thiruvallur District Collector – Respondent
WP No. 6764 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Thirumurugan
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Arunkumar, Mr.T.M.Rajangam, Mr.S.Parthasarathy

Encroachers must be given an opportunity to represent before removal under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the validity of a show cause notice issued for removing encroachments pursuant to complaints made by traders. The Court highlighted the procedures outlined in the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, particularly Section 128, asserting that encroachers should be given an opportunity to defend their position. The Court directed that the respondents conclude eviction proceedings within twelve weeks and dismissed the writ petition. The conclusion emphasized the necessity for encrochers to clear their encroachments while allowing due processes under the law.

Table of Content
1. challenge to show cause notice for encroachment (Para 1 , 2)
2. opportunity for representation under the act (Para 3 , 4)
3. writ petition dismissed with eviction directions (Para 5 , 6)

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

Show cause notice issued by the Executive Authority of Town Panchayat for removing the encroachment is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The authorities identified encroachments based on the complaint given by the traders, and after conducting survey, issued show cause notice for removal of encroachments. Encroachers filed the present writ petition, mainly on the ground that, no opportunity was given to them. Notice would indicate that the encroachers themselves may vacate the encroached portion within the time limit stipulated, and in alternate submit their explanation along with the documents, if any, to the authorities, who in-turn is bound to consider the same, and thereafter, take a final decision for removal of encroachments.

3. This being the procedure as contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, more specifically under Section 128, petitioner is at liberty to submit his representation, if any, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and on receipt of the same, the authorities may take a final decision and remove the encroachments.

4. As far as the claim of the petitioner is are concerned, he is at liberty to submit his application to the competent authority for grant of permission in the vending zone enabling him to run his business. It is needless to state that vending or hawking must be done within the zone earmarked by the Committee under the provisions of the Act. However, encroachers can never be allowed causing obstruction to other traders.

5. Thus, respondents shall proceed with the eviction proceeding and conclude the same within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top