Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MRS S.SRIMATHY, J
A.G.Sekar – Appellant
Versus
Thabasukaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rights based on property purchase and pending litigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observations on patta issuance during ongoing suits. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.A3/220/2026 dated 19.02.2026 and consequently, to direct the 2nd Respondent to mutate Patta in the petitioner favour in respect of the property in Ayan Nanja Survey No.
100/18A1.
2.The contention of the petitioner is that the 5th respondent is the original owner of the property and subsequently, the 5th respondent has sold the property to his son Ajay. The petitioner has purchased the property from the said Ajay on 23/03/2025. However, there is a rival claim to the said property.
3.Therefore, a suit was filed by the rival claimant in O.S.No.32 of 2025 on the file of the Sub Court, Srivaikundam and the same is pending. In the said suit, the petitioner is not arrayed as a party. In such circumstances, the petitioner is seeking mutation but the same may be subject to the result of the pending suit for which the petitioner is relying on the order, dated 19.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
