Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
T.Ramasubramaniam – Appellant
Versus
1.The Principal District Judge, (Disciplinary Authority), Ramanathapuram District Court, Ramanathapuram District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to disciplinary authority order (Para 2) |
| 2. existence of alternative remedy (Para 3) |
| 3. petition rejected (Para 4) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
This writ petition is listed under the caption 'for maintainability'.
2.This writ petition is filed challenging the punishment imposed by the first respondent vide order dated 24.11.2025 in the departmental proceedings initiated as against the petitioner.
3.As there is an alternative appeal remedy as against the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority, the Registry has raised a query regarding the maintainability of this writ petition.
4.Since the present writ petition is filed without availing the effective alternative remedy available to the petitioner, the query raised by the Registry is sustained and this writ petition is rejected at SR stage itself. The petitioner shall file an appeal within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
