Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J
P.Palaniappan – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner HR & CE Department Namakkal. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the appointment of a fit person. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's claim as the de-facto managing trustee and the argument of natural justice violation. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observation on the management scheme for the temples. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. direction for interim administration and final disposal of the petition. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the 1st respondent dated 07.01.2022 appointing the 2nd respondent as the Fit Person for Arulmighu Brammalingeshwarar and Venugopalaswamy Temples, situated at Kokkarayanpettai Village, Komarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District.
2. It is stated that the petitioner is the Managing Trustee / Thakkar of the temple. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been administering the temple as the de-facto Managing Trustee with the support of the villagers for several years.
3. While so, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the 1st respondent, without issuing any prior notice to the petitioner and without affording any opportunity of hearing, passed the impugned order dated 07.01.2022 appointing the 2nd respondent as the Fit Person for the said te
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
