SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24062

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
M.Shanmugam – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Coimbatore District – Respondent
Writ Petition | Article 226



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.S.Kiran
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Rajendiran, AGP

The court emphasized the duty to conduct fair hearings in administrative decisions affecting legal entitlements.

Headnote:Article 226 of the Constitution of India was invoked seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the enquiry completion regarding legal heirship certificate. The court noted the petitioner’s claim of the certificate being fraudulently obtained and directed the third respondent to conduct an enquiry within four weeks. The court's judgment emphasized compliance with procedural fairness.

Table of Content
1. judicial direction for enquiry regarding certificate. (Para 1 , 3)
2. court mandates procedural compliance for fairness. (Para 2 , 5)
3. writ petition resolved with a directive. (Para 4 , 6)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to complete the enquiry and submit a report as per the communication of the second respondent dated 17.03.2025 in Na.Ka. 2065/ 2025/ Aa1.

2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the legal heirship certificate issued by the third respondent dated 23.11.2020 was obtained by fraudulent means and hence, he made several representations to the respondents to cancel the said certificate, for which the second respondent on 17.03.2025 directed the third respondent to conduct an enquiry and to file a report and in the meanwhile, the first respondent also directed the second respondent to take action upon the petitioner’s representation. However, there was no action and hence, the present Writ Petition.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there may be a direction to the third respondent to implement the order of the second respondent dated 17.03.2025 and to conduct an enquiry and file a report, within a reasonable time.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs the third respondent to conduct an enquiry on the petitioner’s representation in regard to cancellation of the legal heirship certificate dated 23.11.2020, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any other interested parties and file a report before the second respondent for further action. Such an exercise shall be completed by the third respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top