Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
K.S.Kannan – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the appointment of a fit person in temple management. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the petitioner's recognition as hereditary trustee. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's findings on hereditary trusteeship and procedural rectification. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final determination regarding recognition and management inquiries. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated
28.01.2026. By the impugned order, a fit person is appointed in respect of Arulmigu Venkatesa Perumal Thirukoil, Kuchanur village.
2.The grievance of the petitioner is that the father of the petitioner along with two other persons were already declared as hereditary trustees. Upon the death of the father, the petitioner has already become the hereditary trustee. The only procedural formality is that the respondents have to recognize the petitioner as the hereditary trustee. Under the said circumstances, when the petitioner is taking care of the temple and administering the temple suddenly without any opportunity whatsoever, by the impugned order a fit person is appointed. The only reason that is mentioned in the impugned order is with reference to the managem
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
