Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
Maheen – Appellant
Versus
The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Goldenrock, Trichy District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash charges based on alleged sufficiency of evidence. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented about the presence and absence of sufficient evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. court reviews submissions and materials without evidential assessment. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. decision to dismiss the petition allowing the trial to proceed. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.14 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy.
2. The petitioner/A1/husband has filed this petition to quash the proceedings against him under Sections 498 (A) of I.P.C and r/w Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 .
3. According to the prosecution, the petitioner married the defacto complainant on 30.11.1998. Subsequently, as per the averments in the petition, they have consistently caused demanded dowry and also caused harassment and hence the defacto complainant has preferred a criminal complaint and the same was registered for the offence under Sections 498 (A) of I.P.C and r/w Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 . Thereafter, investigation conducted an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
