IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
S.Arumugam – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai-600 034 – Respondent
WMP NO. 12446 of 2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review of administrative decisions (Para 1) |
| 2. withdrawal of petitions leads to dismissal (Para 2 , 3) |
PRAYER;Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of certiorarified Mandamus,calling for the records pertaining to the Notice under reference No.Na.Ka.No.6072/2021/A5 dated 23.4.2022 of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the OA No.4 of 2020 originally filed before the 3rd respondent and presently pending before the 2nd respondent within a reasonable time For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.E.Ravichandran For Respondent(s): Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, SGP HR & CE ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the notice dated
23.04.2022 issued by the second respondent and consequently, direct the second respondent to pass orders on the OA No.4 of 2020 originally filed before the 3rd respondent and presently pending before the second respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is not interested to proceed with the present case and hence, he is not pressing the writ petition. To that effect, he has made an endorsement in the case bundle.
3. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.