SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24169

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J
Tvl BOKARIA REINFORCING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED (Rep. by its Director, Pradeep Kumar Bokaria) – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer Ponneri Assessment circle – Respondent
WMP.Nos. 8581 & 8582 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Kamalakanth
For the Respondent(s): Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, GA

Judicial review permits remittance of tax disputes for merit-based evaluation upon compliance with pre-deposit conditions.

Headnote:The Court analyzed a writ petition under Article 226 against an assessment order dated 21.02.2025 for the tax period April 2020 to March 2021. The petitioner, having deposited 10% of the disputed tax, sought a fresh order on merits. The Court granted the petitioner's request subject to further compliance with a 15% deposit within 30 days. Key issues included procedural compliance and merits of assessment. The Court ruled that, upon acknowledgment of deposits, attachments on the petitioner's accounts shall be lifted. The petition was disposed with no costs.

Table of Content
1. court outlines conditions for lifting bank attachments and mandate for compliance. (Para 2 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
2. issuance of a fresh order on merits upon compliance with deposit conditions. (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
3. petitioner willing to increase tax deposit for appeal handling. (Para 5)
4. writ petition disposed with observations and conditions set for respondent. (Para 13)

ORDER

Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

2.This Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

3. The Petitioner is before this court against the impugned Assessment order dated 21.02.2025, passed by the Respondent for the tax period 2020-2021, whereby proposal in Show Cause Notice in DRC 01 dated 26.11.2024 has been confirmed in the absence of a reply to the aforesaid Show Cause Notice.

4. It is noticed that the Petitioner filed an appeal against the impugned Assessment Order dated 21.02.2025 before the Appellate Authority on 17.07.2025 which came to be rejected by the order dated 30.01.2026 on the ground of limitation. The aforesaid order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Appellate Authority records that the Petitioner has already deposited a sum of Rs.4,26,681/- which would be 10% of the disputed tax at the time of the Appeal dated 17.07.2025.

5. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit another 15% of the disputed tax over and above 10% which was already deposited by the Petitioner at the time of filing of the appeal as a condition for denovo adjudication.

6. Considering the above and following the consistent view taken by this court under similar circumstances, this case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing another 15% of the disputed tax over and above 10% which was already deposited by the Petitioner at the time of filing of the appeal, in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 26.11.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

21.02.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 26.11.2024. 8. Needless to state that any amount recovered towards tax liability confirmed by the Respondent vide impugned order shall be adjusted to the pre- deposit of another 15% of the disputed tax over and above 10% which was already deposited by the Petitioner at the time of filing of the appeal as ordered above. This will be however subject to verification of the Respondent.

9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of another 15% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

13. This Writ Petition stand disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top