SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24181

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOVINDARAJAN, J
THILAKAVADI Natarajan @ Nataraj – Appellant
Versus
Tamilanban – Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal | M.C.O.P.No.933 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Velmurugan
For the Respondent – 1: Notice Dispensed withdraw
For Respondent – 2: Mr.J.Chandran

The court affirmed that compensation must reflect actual medical expenses incurred by the appellant, leading to an enhancement of the awarded amount for personal injury.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Appeal for enhancement of compensation - The court enhanced the compensation in a personal injury claim from Rs.2,18,415/- to Rs.3,18,415/- due to grievous injuries sustained in a motorcycle accident - It was established that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving. (Paras 2, 14, 17)

(B) Quantum of Compensation - The court observed that the appellant had presented medical bills substantiating claims significantly higher than awarded and concluded that the initial award was inadequate given the substantial medical expenses incurred. (Paras 10, 14)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was struck by a motorcycle while walking, resulting in multiple grievous injuries. A claim was originally filed for Rs.20,00,000/-, but the tribunal awarded only Rs.2,18,415/-. The appeal sought to enhance this amount based on substantial evidence of incurred medical expenses.

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the appeal regarding medical expenses, leading to an enhancement of the compensation amount.

Issues: The primary issues involved whether the compensation awarded was adequate considering the medical expenses evidenced by the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the accompanying medical evidence warranted a re-evaluation of compensation, adhering to the principle that compensation should reflect the incurred and ongoing costs related to the injury sustained.

Result: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed; compensation enhanced to Rs.3,18,415/- with interest and conditions for payment.

Table of Content
1. accident details and claimant's injuries. (Para 2)
2. respective responses from parties. (Para 3 , 4)
3. evidence presented in the tribunal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. compensation awarded by tribunal. (Para 8)
5. arguments by appellant and insurance company. (Para 10 , 11)
6. court's review on evidence and submissions. (Para 12)
7. decision on enhancement of compensation. (Para 14 , 15)
8. final order and direction for payment. (Para 17)

JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the appellant/claimant seeking to enhance the quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dharmapuri vide Order dated 13.08.2025 in M.C.O.P.No.933 of 2022.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

On 20.09.2022, at about 8.30 p.m., when the appellant/claimant was walking on the left side of the Dharmapuri – Salem Main Road opposite to Kamalam Hospital, Dharmapuri, a Honda CD 110 motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN 29 BF 9774 which was driven by its rider in a rash and negligent manner, hit the appellant/claimant, due to which, the appellant/claimant had sustained multiple grievous injuries all over his body. Therefore, the appellant/claimant had filed a Claim Petition in M.C.O.P.No.933 of 2022 against the 1st respondent (owner of the offending vehicle) and 2nd respondent/Insurance Company (insurer of the offending vehicle) claiming a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- as compensation for the multiple grievous injuries sustained by him.

3. The 1st respondent (owner of the offending vehicle) had remained ex parte before the Tribunal.

4. The 2nd respondent/Insurance Company (insurer of the offending vehicle) had filed its counter statement denying all the averments made by the appellant/claimant in the Claim Petition.

5. Before the Tribunal, on the side of claimant, appellant/claimant examined himself as P.W.1 and 14 documents were marked as Exs.P1 to P14. On the side of Insurance Company, no one was examined as witness and no documents were marked as exhibits. The Disability Certificate issued to the appellant/claimant was marked as Ex.C1.

6. On appreciation of the oral and documentary evidence, the Tribunal has arrived at the finding that the accident had occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the rider who drove the motorcycle.

7. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.2,18,415/- as compensation to the appellant/claimant. The break-up details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal are as follows:

S.No. Heads Amount awarded under various Heads
1 Pain and Sufferings Rs.20,000/-
2 Loss of Amenities Rs.15,000/-
3 Loss of Income Rs.16,000/-
4 Medical Expenses as per Ex.P10 Rs.94,415/-
5 Transport Expenses Rs.30,000/-

6 Permanent Disability Rs.28,000/-
7 Attender Charges Rs.5,000/-
8 Nourishment Charges Rs.10,000/-
Total Rs.2,18,415/-

8. The Tribunal vide Order dated 13.08.2025, partly allowed M.C.O.P.No.933 of 2022 and directed the 2nd respondent/Insurance Company (insurer of the offending vehicle) to pay a sum of Rs.2,18,415/- as compensation to the appellant/claimant, with proportionate cost and interest at

7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of realization. 9. Now, the appellant/claimant has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal before this Court, seeking to enhance the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

10. Mr.S.Velmurugan, learned counsel for appellant/claimant submitted that though the appellant/claimant had claimed Rs.20,00,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the accident, the Tribunal has awarded only a sum of Rs.2,18,415/- as compensation to the appellant/claimant. He further submitted that in the accident occurred on 20.09.2022, appellant/claimant had suffered ACL & MCL ligament tears and meniscus injury. The appellant/claimant had spent around Rs.1,94,481/- for his medical treatment. However, at the time of filing the Claim Petition, the appellant/claimant had enclose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top