Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
Inderchand Kochar – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar G – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's plea to reject the plaint based on the arbitration clause. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counterarguments presented by the respondents regarding the plaint's maintainability. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's ruling on jurisdiction and the role of civil courts in arbitration matters. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
Prayer:- The application has been filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 11(d) of Civil Procedure Code , 1908, to reject the Plaint filed in C.S.No.28 of 2025 pending on the file of this Court as being devoid of any cause of action under Order VII Rule XI of the Civil Procedure Code .
For Applicant(s): Mr.Nataraj for M/s.Anirudh A Sriram For Respondent(s): Mr.M.L.Joseph for M/s.Chennai Law Association.
ORDER
This application has been filed by the applicant to reject the plaint in C.S.No.28 of 2025 as the devoid of cause of action under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C.
2.According to the applicant he is the defendant in the main suit filed for the relief of declaration in respect of memorandum of understanding dated 22.10.2021 and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant proceeding with arbitration under the memorandum of understanding
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
