Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Muthu Adaikkappan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir's validity dependent on the nature of allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments reflect on quashing fir on procedural grounds. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court outlines the rationale for the decision to quash. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling based on previous legal evaluations. (Para 9) |
ORDER
The accused in Crime No.4 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police has filed the present petition seeking to quash the F.I.R wherein the petitioner is alleged to have committed offences under Sections 296(b) and 115 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
2.A perusal of the F.I.R reveals that the complainant had alleged that there is a dispute between himself and his brother (accused) with regard to the administration of the college. On 29.12.2025, when complainant had entered into the college, his brother (accused) had abused him and threatened him that he should not enter into the college. It is further alleged in the F.I.R that by using hands, the accused person is said to have beaten the defacto complainant in his stomach and attacked the Office Assistant also. Since the injuries were very minor in nature, they have not gone to the hospital. It is further alleged in the co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
