Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
N.Peruma – Appellant
Versus
1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks removal of encroachment on public pathway. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. court permits petition to proceed to final disposal. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court orders survey and action on encroachment. (Para 6) |
| 4. final ruling on the writ petition. (Para 7) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made by the fourth respondent in T.S. No. 1183, situated at Adi Dravidar Street, Pappa Melatheru, Block 8, Ward No. 6 of Tirunelveli Corporation, Tirunelveli District, which is classified as a public pathway.
2.By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3.Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 3. Considering the limited relief sought for by the petitioner, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.
4.It is the contention of the petitioner that the fourth respondent has encroached upon the public pathway by laying a building foundation and placing construction materials on the said pathway. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a repre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
