Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Kumaresh Babu, J
M/s B.S. Pictures Rep By Its Proprietor Balasundaram – Appellant
Versus
S. Sriram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lack of representation by the appellant. (Para 1) |
| 2. court observations on repeated non-representation. (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.03.2026, there was no representation on the side of the appellant, either in person or through the learned counsel. Hence, this Court directed the matter to be listed on
17.03.2026.
2. Again, when the matter was taken up for hearing on 17.03.2026, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. In order to grant one more opportunity, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter on 23.03.2026 (today) under the caption “For Dismissal”.
3. Even today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, it is evident that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, this appeal suit stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
