SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
V.Ramadass – Appellant
Versus
V.Saravanan – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.26272 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.D.Ramya
For the Respondents: Mr.S.C.Herold Singh

Compliance with court orders negates contempt claims.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the compliance with its order dated 24.09.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.26272 of 2025 regarding contempt of court. The facts indicate that the petitioner has alleged willful disobedience of the earlier order. The Court found that the respondents complied with its directions, leading to the conclusion that the contempt petition is closed.

Table of Content
1. allegation of willful disobedience. (Para 1)
2. respondents reported compliance with the order. (Para 2)

O R D E R

This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner complaining willful disobedience of the order dated 24.09.2025, in W.P.(MD)

No.26272 of 2025, passed by this Court.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel on either side reported that the respondents have complied with orders passed by this Court.

3. In such circumstances, this contempt petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top