Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Suresh Kumar, N. Senthilkumar, JJ
Ramathal – Appellant
Versus
The Authorized Officer State Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed under sarfaesi act regarding compliance failure. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. tribunal's rejection due to non-compliance. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court finds no merit in the petition. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. dismissal with liberty for future appeal. (Para 7) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR W.P.No.8518 of 2026 Ramathal .. Petitioner Vs.
1. The Authorized Officer State Bank of India, SME Branch P.No.Road, 54, First Floor Uthukulli Road, Tiruppur – 641 601.
2. M/s. Win Apparels Rep. By its Proprietrix, R.Sridevi No.1, Poonthottam, Avinashi Road Tiruppur – 641 603.
3. Shanmugavaidu .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 29.04.2024 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in AIR(SA)196/2022 and to quash the same and consequently direct the DRAT to number the second appeal and decide the case on merits.
For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Thirumoorthy For the Respondents : Mr.R.Sreedhar Standing Counsel for R1 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This writ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
