Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.Lakshminarayanan, J
Singaraj – Appellant
Versus
R.Bose – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and appearance of advocates. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding the initial suit for specific performance and the necessity for cross-examination. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court emphasizes the importance of cross-examination and evaluates the trial court's previous decisions. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final directions for proceedings and acknowledgment of delays. (Para 12 , 13) |
COMMON ORDER
Heard Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh for the petitioner, Mr.S.Ravindran for first respondent and Mr.R.Ganesan for eighth respondent.
2. These Civil Revision Petitions challenge the common order passed by the learned Principal District Munsif at Tirumangalam in I.A.Nos.5 and 6 of 2026 in O.S.No.243 of 2008 dated 20.01.2026. The defendants 1 and 12 are the civil revision petitioners.
3. The first respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 09.03.2005. The suit was taken on file by the District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam and numbered as O.S.No.243 of 2008. Summons were served on the defendants. The defendants have also filed their written statement. Pending the litigation, the first defendant is said to have alienated the property in fav
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
