SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J
S. Meenakshisundaram – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration – Respondent
WP No. 10150 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Ranganathan
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Jayachandran

The Registration Department has no authority to cancel registered documents; such matters must be resolved in civil court.

Headnote:The petitioner sought the cancellation of certain registered documents regarding property, claiming these entries were fake. The Court noted that the Registration Department lacks the authority to cancel documents under Section 77A, previously deemed unconstitutional. The petitioner was advised to pursue the matter in civil court. Final order allowed the petitioner to approach civil court for relief.

Table of Content
1. petition for cancellation of registered documents. (Para 1 , 2)
2. registration department lacks authority to cancel documents. (Para 3)
3. relief to approach civil court granted. (Para 4)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to remove all the alleged fake entries made in the office of the Sub Registrar, Chinnamanur, in respect of the property morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition.

2. The ultimate relief, the petitioner is seeking through this writ petition is to cancel the registered documents, namely Document Nos.2343 of 2021, 1947 of 2005, 1948 of 2005, 1950 of 2005, 1951 of 2005 and 4324 of 2008.

3. It has been consistently held by the constitutional courts that a prayer for cancellation of documents cannot be granted by the Registration Department. The Division Bench of this Court has also held that Section 77A of the Registration Act, which enables the Registration Department to cancel registered documents, is also “unconstitutional”. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner, if at all maintainable, can be redressed only by a civil court.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach a civil court seeking for the relief as prayed for in this writ petition. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top