Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J
Sutherland Global Services Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner -II (C AND R) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the writ petition and the background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. court's reasoning for granting an extension for compliance. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. discussion on arguments presented and the conclusion. (Para 4 , 8 , 9) |
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai in EPF Appeal No.71 of 2024 and to quash the interim order dated 17.09.2025 and the consequential dismissal order dated 31.10.2025 and consequently, to direct the Tribunal to entertain, hear and decide the appeal on merits.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, as against the order passed under Section 7B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai, in E.P.F.Appeal No.71 of 2024. The appellate authority, by interim order dated 17.09.2025, granted stay subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit 25% of the assessed amount, within a period of four (4) weeks. However, the pet
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
