Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
Kathleen Manuvel – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Manager State Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks release of funds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent to consider representation. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs action within time. (Para 4) |
| 4. case disposed without costs. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1 and 2 respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 08.01.2026 and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to release and disburse a sum of Rs.6,08,152.90 lying in savings bank account No.11379331134 belonging to the petitioner’s deceased husband.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s husband maintained a Saving Bank Account with the 2nd respondent Bank and passed away on 19.11.2020. It is further submitted that the petitioner was nominated as the nominee in the said account. However, the amount has not been transferred in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 08.01.2026. Till date, no orders have been passed on the said representation. Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
3. Mr. R. Sreedhar, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents and submits th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
