SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24657

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
R.A. Khaja Moideen – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Executive Officer – Respondent
Writ Petition No.83 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Y. Kajanavas
For the Respondents: Mr. T. Saikrishnan for R1 and R2

The court emphasizes the need for timely action by administrative bodies in conducting elections as mandated by legislation, ensuring adherence to procedural requirements.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the 1st respondent to conduct elections for the 4th respondent Waqf as per prior proceedings. The case revolves around the supervisory control of the Waqf Board under Section 32 of the Waqf Act. The court directs the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders within six weeks.

Result: The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions.

Table of Content
1. request for election conduct. (Para 1 , 2)
2. writ disposed with specific directions. (Para 4)

ORDER

By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to conduct election to the 4th respondent Wakf as per the proceedings of the 2nd respondent and the reminder representation dated 17.01.2026 within the time limit.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the Waqf, namely Muslim Jamath Indira Nagar Masjid Madarasa is a registered and notified Waqf, bearing Reg.No.287, coming under the supervisory control of the 1st respondent / Waqf Board under Section 32 of the Waqf Act. The election committee was completed as early as in the year 2018 and thereafter, the erstwhile Muthawalli had not taken any steps to conduct the election. In such circumstances, the petitioner earlier has sent a representation to the 1st respondent to immediately conduct election and as per the instructions of the 1st respondent, the 2nd respondent had issued a proceedings dated 04.09.2023 that the election will be conducted on 29.09.2023. The challenge made to the said proceedings by the 3rd respondent had also ended in dismissal in W.P.No.27733 of 2023 dated 03.03.2026. Even thereafter, no steps were taken to conduct the election. The petitioner has also sent a reminder / representation dated 17.01.2026 to the 1st respondent to conduct election and the same was not considered till date and hence, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials.

4. Considering the limited scope of prayer sought for by the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.01.2026 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top