Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.Kamachi D
For the Respondents: Dr.T.Seenivasan, SGP

The court determined the petitions were rendered infructuous, reflecting the principle that ongoing legal actions may lose relevance over time.

Headnote:The writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the auction notice issued and allot shops to the petitioners as per guidelines. The Court found the petitions disposed of as infructuous based on prior orders in related petitions. No costs were awarded. The connected miscellaneous petitions also closed.

COMMON ORDER

In view of the order passed in W.P.Nos.30624 and 30628 of 2025, dated

18.03.2026, these writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. No Costs.

Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :