T.Sivaganasambandan vs The Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of India New Delhi

Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24675

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arun Murugan, J
T.Sivaganasambandan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of India New Delhi – Respondent
W.P.No.4965 of 2026

Important Points

Judicial discretion under Article 226 allows withdrawal of petitions with liberty to renew the application.

Subject

Administrative Law - Writ Jurisdiction

Act Referred

Constitution of India: Article 226

Headnote

Article 226 of the Constitution of India allows for a writ of Certiorari to challenge notifications and provisions of acts deemed unlawful. The petitioner sought to quash provisions of the VB-G-RAM G Act dated 21.12.2025. The court analyzed the requests and allowed the petitioner to withdraw their petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The case was determined to be dismissed as withdrawn.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. M.L.Ravi
For the Respondents: Mrs. S.S.Meenakumary Senior Panel Counsel for R1 to R4, Mr. E.Vijay Anand Additional Government Pleader for R5

For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.L.Ravi For Respondent(s): Mrs. S.S.Meenakumary Senior Panel Counsel for R1 to R4 Mr. E.Vijay Anand Additional Government Pleader for R5 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition.

2. With aforesaid liberty, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications are also dismissed.