SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24689

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, P.B.Balaji, JJ
P.Irulandi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Gowrishankar
For the Respondents: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, M/s.K.Hema Karthikeyan, Mr.S.Saravana Kumar

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter based on the principles of natural justice. (Para 1)
2. requirement for issuance of notice as per principles of natural justice. (Para 2)

(Judgment of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)

Heard both sides.

2.By the impugned order, the Commissioner, Cumbum Municipality had called upon the writ petitioner to remove the alleged encroachment. Before issuing the impugned order under Section 182 of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920, no showcase notice was issued. It is true that the Act is silent about issuance of notice. However, the principles of natural justice will have to be read into such provisions. It is relevant to note that the new enactment contains a specific provision for issuing show cause notice. In this view of the matter, the order impugned in the writ petition is quashed. Liberty is given to the local body to take action as per law.

3.This Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top