SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24698

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Karuppaiah – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar Office, Annavasal, Pudukkottai District. – Respondent
Writ Petition | RFL/Annavasal/21/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs.S.Prabha for Mr.D.Rameshkumar
For the Respondents: Mrs.K.Malathi Additional Government Pleader

A non-traceable certificate from Police is essential for registering a lost parent deed under Section 34-C of the Registration Act.

Headnote:The petitioner challenges the refusal of registration of a settlement deed due to the absence of a parent deed. The court notes that the parent deed is alleged to be lost and emphasizes compliance with Section 34-C of the Registration Act requiring a non-traceable certificate issued by the jurisdictional Police. The petitioner is instructed to obtain this certificate to facilitate re-presentation of the document for registration.

Table of Content
1. challenge against refusal of registration (Para 1)
2. requirement for non-traceable certificate for lost parent deed (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Karuppaiah ... Petitioner -vs-

The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar Office, Annavasal, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondent PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings in RFL/Annavasal/21/2026, dated 04.03.2026, issued by the respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to register the settlement deed dated 04.03.2026 presented by the petitioner, within the time that may be stipulated by this Court without insisting for the production of original parent document.

For Petitioner : Mrs.S.Prabha for Mr.D.Rameshkumar For Respondent : Mrs.K.Malathi Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The writ petition is filed challenging the refusal check slip dated

04.03.2026. When the petitioner presented the settlement deed for registration, the same was refused on the ground that the parent deed was not produced by the petitioner.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the parent deed is non-traceable, as it was lost during the renovation of his house. Even so, in view of Section 34-C of the Registration Act, if the document is lost, the petitioner has to produce a non-

traceable certificate.

3. Therefore, it is open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Police regarding the missing document. The same shall be dealt with in accordance with the relevant circular and in the manner known to law, and a non- traceable certificate may be issued by the jurisdictional Police as expeditiously as possible.

4. As and when such a certificate is issued, it will be open to the petitioner to re-present the document, upon which it may be registered.

5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top