Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
S.Karuppuchamy – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer Paramakudi Sub-Division Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consent to dispose of writ petition at admission stage. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner claims inaction regarding suspension review. (Para 4) |
| 3. suspension review must adhere to government guidelines. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court orders timely action on representation. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
Mr.S.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondent.
2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.
4. The petitioner herein, while working as Village Administrative Officer in Venthoni Group, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, on certain allegations of corruption, was placed under suspension through proceedings dated 10.12.2025, issued by the respondent herein and he is being continued under suspension till date. Under those circumstances, the petitioner is claimed to have submitted a representation dated 20.01.2026 to the respondent seeking revocation of the suspension. However, the said representation is still pending consideration before the respondent. Hence, the petitioner has approached
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
