Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, P.DHANABAL, JJ
Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the victim's case and accusations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. evidence from the victim and corroborative testimonies. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. claims of false accusations due to family issues. (Para 11) |
| 4. medical evidence and forensic confirmation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. court's reasoning for upholding conviction. (Para 18) |
| 6. final confirmation of conviction and sentence. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J) This criminal appeal has been filed assailing the judgment passed by the Mahila Court, Pudukottai in Spl. S.C.No.26/2022 dated 29.08.2022, wherein, the accused person has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:
The sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the period of sentence already undergone is ordered to be set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused person is the father and the victim girl is the daughter. The victim girl was studying in 11th standard at Government Higher Secondary School. The accused person is said to have committed penetrative sexual assault against the victim girl repeatedly and as a result, the victim girl became pregnant and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
