IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
S.Gunasekar – Appellant
Versus
M.Arumugam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner is a necessary party (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMP NO. 25773 OF 2025,CMP NO. 22553 OF 2025, CMP NO. 25770 OF 2025 & CMP NO. 25780 OF 2025 S.Gunasekar S/o Swami, Res at No.38/1, Ramakrishnan Street, Perambur, Chennai 600 011 ..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. M.Arumugam S/o Muniappan, No.247, Kamaraj Street, Kakkanhi Colony, Vyasarpadi, Chennai 600 039
2. P.R.Jayanthi W/o P.Ramesh, No.38/1, Ramakrishnan Street, Perambur, Chennai 600 011 Presently Res at No.C3, 404, India Bulls (Greens) Perumbakkam, Kancheepuram Dt ..Respondent(s)
PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Art. 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Order dated 18.08.2025 passed in IA.No. 6 of 2024 in OS.No.5616 of 2021 on the file of XV Additional City Civil Court at Chennai by allowing this CRP thereby impleading the petitioner as a party/2nd defendant in the suit For Petitioner(s): Mr. V. Nallasenapathy For Respondent(s): Ms.Sharmila for Mr.S.Dinesh Babu
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.6 of 2024 in O.S.No.5616 of 2021 by the learned XV Additional Judge, City Civi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.