IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
V.Chandra (died) – Appellant
Versus
G.Ramu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging dismissal of implead application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners' counsel argues wrong provisions used. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes correctness of means to implead. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.S.No.352 of 2007 by the learned District Munsif, Tambaram, the Revision Petitioners/Proposed Plaintiffs 2 to 4 preferred this Civil Revision Petition. 2.Before the trial court, the Revision Petitioners filed an application under Order I Rule 10 of C.P.C. to implead themselves as plaintiffs 2 to 4 in the suit based on the Will said to be executed on 05.02.2019 by the original plaintiff Chandra and she died on 16.05.2021. The said application was contested by the defendants stating that the said application as such is not maintainable and proposed parties have not furnished the correct particulars and no reason assigned for the delay in filing the application. Considering their objections, the trial judge has refused to entertain the said application, as the application was not filed in proper manner and they have not taken steps to implead the legal heirs of deceased plaintiff within a stipulated time. Therefore,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.