Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
M.Prem Anand – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Collectorate, Ramanathapuram District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of petition under g.o.ms.no.81 and reasons for suspension. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. requirement for timely reports from vigilance authorities. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. mandate to review suspension orders under statutory guidelines. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
Heard Mr.I.Pinaygash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to revoke his suspension and to reinstate him in service in a non-sensitive post, in light of the orders issued by the Government in G.O.Ms. No. 81 (Human Resources Development) dated 04.08.2022, by duly considering his representation dated 11.11.2025.
3. The petitioner herein, who was working as a Village Administrative Officer, was placed under suspension through proceedings in Roc.A5/8543/2025 dated 14.08.2025, consequent upon his involvement in Cr.No.16 of 2025 dated 13.08.2025 under Section 7(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and the consequential arrest. The said criminal case is still pending as on date, and more than six months have lapsed since the date of suspension. I
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
