Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24944
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. MARIA CLETE, J
Quresh Badruddin – Appellant
Versus
Mohammedally Dehgamwala Public Charitable Trust – Respondent
A. No. 661 of 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Shah And Shah
For the Respondents: M/s.M.Murthy, Druv A. Thaker
The court recognizes and enforces the joint memo of compromise between the parties, establishing the terms for settlement and court fee refunds.
Headnote:The Court addressed the matter under the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Suit & Valuation Act, 1955, referencing a joint memo of compromise reached between the parties. The court determined to dispose of the suit in accordance with this compromise, and ordered the refund of court fees, concluding that the joint memo shall form part of the decree.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mediation led to a compromise. (Para 1) |
| 2. judgment disposing suit as per compromise. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Earlier, this Court, on 10.02.2026 had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras. Accordingly, the parties have appeared before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court Madras and arrived at a compromise in the suit for specific performance and entered into a joint memo of compromise dated 05.03.2026.
2. In view of the joint memo of compromise arrived at between the parties before the Mediation Centre, High Court Madras, this Civil Suit is disposed of in terms of the joint memo of compromise dated 05.03.2026. The said joint memo of compromise shall form part of the decree. Refund of Court fee ordered under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Suit & Valuation Act, 1955. Consequently, connected applications, if any, stand closed.
